TeeJaw Blog

The Alaska Recount in GOP Senate Primary — UPDATE

Posted in Government and Politics by TeeJaw on Tuesday, August 31, 2010, 12: 37 PM

The close Republican U.S. Senate primary pits the GOP establishment against the Tea Party Movement. Tea Party favorite and Palin-endorsed Joe Miller is ahead of establishment-backed Lisa Murkowski by 1,668 votes. But 23,000 absentee ballots have not been counted. For Murkowski to wipe out Miller’s lead and win the election she needs 12,335 of those 23,000 votes, or 53.63% of the total.

There were 92,386 total votes cast in the Republican primary between Murkowski and Miller, with Miller receiving 50.9% and Murkowski 49.1%. For her to get 53.63% of the remaining 23,000 votes would seem to be a statistical improbability bordering on an impossibility. The first 92,000 votes constitutes a poll with a margin or error near zero given the size of the sample. Murkowski will have to cheat in order to win.

On the other hand, it is said that Miller gained momentum in the last two weeks of the election, and it is presumed that the absentee ballots were cast before that. The number of absentee ballots is already becoming a comic joke. It started at 7500, then it was 15,000, now the 23,000 figure I used, but some accounts have it at close to 26,000. At this rate the absentee ballots will soon exceed the polling booth ballots.

The constantly changing number of absentee ballots brings to mind the constantly changing number of newly-discovered ballots in the Al Franken-Norm Coleman debacle during the recount of the Minnesota Senate election in 2008, and may signal that election shenanigans have already begun. Assuming a Republican win over Democrat Scott MacAdams, which seems likely, will Lisa Murkowski become the Republican version of Al Franken in the U.S. Senate? Would that suit the GOP establishment who, apparently, badly misses Ted Stevens?

UPDATE: Murkowski threw in the towel after the first 9500 absentee ballots were counted without significantly reducing Miller’s lead. This his how an honest recount would be expected to go, even in a close race a recount seldom changes the outcome unless it’s done by Democrats in Minnesota, Washington state or Florida (Democrats came close in Florida but didn’t cheat quite enough).

Murkowski is to be commended for doing the right thing.


4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. One Hand Clapping said, on Tuesday, August 31, 2010, 2: 46 PM at 2:46 PM

    You mean that the counting of ballots and votes is not an exact science?

    • TeeJaw said, on Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 7: 48 AM at 7:48 AM

      Yeah like, you know, arithmetic? But double counting, destroying ballots, lying and cheating, those things are not an exact science. Well, at least we never thought they were.

      • Larry said, on Friday, September 3, 2010, 9: 21 PM at 9:21 PM

        But double counting, destroying ballots, lying and cheating are things liberals now have down pat. Thank God algore wasn’t quite up to speed in 2000.

  2. ronald reagan said, on Friday, November 5, 2010, 8: 53 PM at 8:53 PM


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: