You may recall the DEA agent who held up his .40 caliber Glock pistol in front of a Florida high school class, declared “I’m the only one in this room professional enough…to carry this Glock 40,” and then proceeded to shoot himself in the foot. Agent Lee Paige later brought suit against DEA claiming the DEA officials made him a “target of jokes, derision, ridicule, and disparaging comments,” and ruined his career. He had been an undercover agent and, somewhat curiously, claimed to have been a successful motivational speaker. His theory of the case was that he suffered damages because the DEA had released a widely viewed video of the incident, which occurred in 2004. A federal judge has now dismissed Paige’s suit because Paige failed to produce any evidence on the source of the video.
Here is the video from 2004:
In defense of Mr. Paige, the DEA is not giving its agents very good training if it can’t even teach them to keep their finger off the trigger until ready to shoot, to always treat their gun as if it were loaded (which it was) and to never point it at anything they are not willing to destroy. If Mr. Paige were simply not receptive to training that does not let the DEA off the hook. The people running the show are responsible to know if they have that sort of problem and correct it before this sort of thing happens. The Sheriff of the county I live in takes care of business and I can’t imagine one of his deputies having an event like this. No responsible and well-trianed law enforcement officer would remove a loaded pistol from a holster in a high school classroom just to show it to the kids.
The left-wing intelligentsia cannot defend any of its ideas with reasoned argument, cannot or will not respond to any of the objections raised by conservatives to their socialist plans for America; in frustration or confusion when presented with an actual debate they resort to hateful name calling. So, if we object to having a trophy mosque erected near the site where radical Islam murdered 2,700 Americans we are called racist, Islamophobic and intolerant. We are told that we must be sensitive to the feelings of Muslims, but we dare not suggest that Muslims perhaps ought to be sensitive to the feelings of the loved ones of those who were senselessly slaughtered by Muslims, in the name of Allah.
Debra Burlingame (sister of Charles “Chic” Burlingame III, the pilot of the hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 that was flown into the Pentagon on 9/11), speaking on behalf of the 9/11 families, responded to Obama’s announcement of his support of the ground-zero mosque at the White Ramadan dinner:
Barack Obama has abandoned America at the place where America’s heart was broken nine years ago, and where her true values were on display for all to see. Since that dark day, Americans have been asked to bear the burden of defending those values, again and again and again. Now this president declares that the victims of 9/11 and their families must bear another burden. We must stand silent at the last place in America where 9/11 is still remembered with reverence or risk being called religious bigots.
Read the rest of Ms. Burlingame’s statement here.
As is his way, Thomas Sowell writes a few simple sentences that get right to the heart of whatever controversy he chooses to address. Here he is on the ground-zero mosque wrangle:
The proposed mosque near where the World Trade Center was attacked and destroyed, along with thousands of American lives, would be a 15-story middle finger to America.
It takes a high IQ to evade the obvious, so it is not surprising that the intelligentsia are out in force, decrying those who criticize this calculated insult.
What may surprise some people is that the American taxpayer is currently financing a trip to the Middle East by the imam who is pushing this project, so that he can raise the money to build it. The State Department is subsidizing his travel.
The big talking point is that this is an issue about “religious freedom” and that Muslims have a “right” to build a mosque where they choose. But those who oppose this project are not claiming that there is no legal right to build a mosque near the site of the World Trade Center.
If anybody did, it would be a matter for the courts to decide — and they would undoubtedly say that it is not illegal to build a mosque near the site of the World Trade Center attack.
The intelligentsia and others who are wrapping themselves in the Constitution are fighting a phony war against a straw man. Why create a false issue, except to evade the real issue?
Our betters are telling us that we need to be more “tolerant” and more “sensitive” to the feelings of Muslims. But if we are supposed to be sensitive to Muslims, why are Muslims not supposed to be sensitive to the feelings of millions of Americans, for whom 9/11 was the biggest national trauma since Pearl Harbor?
It would not be illegal for Japanese Americans to build a massive shinto shrine next to Pearl Harbor. But, in all these years, they have never sought to do it.
Read the rest of Thomas Sowell’s article here.
Anyone who doubts the real purpose of the ground-zero mosque might want to consider the recent revelations of how the Orlando mosque has been used as a fund-raising arm for terrorism:
A few years ago the IRS successfully prosecuted several individuals who were evading taxes by claiming to be a “church” under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Here, this “mosque” is gathering money to give to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood under the guise of a church and telling the contributors that their donations are charitable deductions under 501(c)(3) while at the same time admitting “This is not charity, this is politics.” Aside from the support of terrorist groups, which is a Federal felony, this is a case on a silver platter for a tax evasion prosecution under Section 7201 of the Internal Revenue Code. Where is the IRS? Where is the Justice Department?
Mexican President Felipe Calderon came to the United States, spoke before Congress and then went on CNN’s Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer. Their is no kinder way to describe his visit than to say that in both instances he made a fool of himself, to the wild cheers of Democrats [to their everlasting embarrassment a few Republicans saps also applauded].
Calderon did something that foreign politicians, even dictators, usually try to avoid. He came here and inserted himself into a one of our hot domestic political issues. Foreign leaders normally avoid that because you can never be sure which way the winds will blow tomorrow. If you make an enemy today of the faction that comes into power tomorrow you have made a grave mistake that will weaken your interests in the future. It goes against Machiavelli’s strongest advice to a prince lest he end up on the losing side when the matter is finally resolved. Nations do not have friends, nations have interests. Squandering the future interests of your own country for some feel-good pandering to the current regime is a fool’s game; smart foreign leaders don’t do it. By helping Obama play the race card against Arizona, Calderon showed himself to be a fool, and made a jackass of himself before the world. [The world probably loved it, but will still recognize Calderon as a dummy]
Calderon pandered to Obama and the Democrats by attacking the Arizona law as “violating the human rights of all people” and constituting racial discrimination. Never mind that the law does not allow police in Arizona any more latitude in stopping anyone and asking for ID than existed before the law was enacted. The same standard of “reasonable suspicion” that criminal activity may be afoot still applies to every police stop of any person, a standard first established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). The new Arizona law simply provides that if the person has been legally stopped and questioned and cannot produce one of several forms of ID that are deemed adequate by the law (a drivers license will do), and if there is reason to believe that person is in the country illegally then that person can be transported to a Federal immigration facility. After that, their ultimate fate is left to Federal immigration officials. This is what Obama, and now with aid and comfort from Calderon, calls racial profiling.
Calderon also injected himself in the issue of gun control in the United States. He made the ridiculous and ignorant claim that Mexican drug lords are getting their weapons from the U.S. Apparently, he wants us to believe that they are crossing the border and buying machine guns, grenade launchers, bazookas, and improvised explosive devices from mom and pop gun stores in Arizona and Texas. To my knowledge there has only been one case where a gun store was charged with selling an illegal weapon to Mexican drug lords and it was thrown out of court because the prosecution showed up for trial with no evidence to support the charge. If indeed any Mexican drug lords are obtaining weapons from the United States they and whoever is supplying those weapons are breaking felony laws already on the books. Nevertheless, Calderon wants Congress to re-impose the Clinton gun ban on AR-15 semi-automatic rifles, the most popular rifle owned by law-abiding Americans for hunting, sport shooting, and home defense. These are not even the sort of weapons most commonly used by Mexican drug lords who are outfitted with full-auto machine guns which no American can legally own (unless it is a fully registered piece, requiring the approval of law enforcement, and was manufactured prior to 1986; a limited stock of these exist and they can cost upwards of $25,000 a copy).
Of course, Congressional Democrats gave Calderon a standing ovation after he concluded his idiotic rant.
Next he appeared on CNN’s Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer for another round of jackass remarks. Mexico has issued a travelers’s warning to its citizens against traveling to Arizona. Blitzer asked Calderon what a Mexican citizen with a passport and a tourist visa has to fear in Arizona. Calderon stumbled around searching for an answer and the best he could come up with was, “Well, they look Mexican.” Really. Lets see, I’m not sure what percentage of Arizona residents “look Mexican” but I am confident it is quite a significant percentage. I’m willing to bet that in Arizona a fair number of bureaucrats, police officers, mayors, local politicians, firefighters, Federal immigration officers, border patrol officers, College professors, business owners and executives, etc.,etc. also “look Mexican.” Does Calderon believe the new Arizona law puts them in danger? Did he feel foolish making such an asinine statement on national television and before the U.S. Congress? Well, I guess not. The Democrats in Congress didn’t feel foolish giving him a standing ovation for it.
What I’ve said so far only scratches the surface of Calderon’s jackass behavior in the United States. This episode in history will be remembered in the 22nd century. The video below has Wolf Blitzer asking Calderon if a citizen of Guatemala or Nicaragua could walk across the Mexican border and get a job in Mexico. Of course, Calderon with no apparent realization of how ridiculous the answer to Blitzer’s question was making him out to be, stated the obvious that no, one cannot walk across the Mexican border and get a job. As he said, “We want to ask, ‘who are you?’ when you come into Mexico,” and “You must fill out a form.” Can you get a job and work? “No, you must have permission,” said Calderon. What if one sneaks into Mexico and starts working? What happens? “We send back them,” Calderon replied, obviously meaning, “We send them back [to where they came from]”.
Blitzer asks, “Do Mexican Police go around asking people for papers?” Calderon’s answer: “Of, Course.”
When asked about about Mexico’s immigration laws that subject illegal immigrants to years in a Mexican prison, Calderon admits that this was the law in Mexico until one year ago when he says it was repealed. Now, he says with no apparent awareness of a contradiction, “Illegal immigration into Mexico is no longer a crime.”
You can watch Calderon’s witless performance on this short video:
Mona Charen writes:
While the administration was fulminating about the horrific human-rights violation the Arizona law represents, Amnesty International was issuing a report about Mexico’s mistreatment of its own illegal migrants. “Migrants in Mexico are facing a major human rights crisis leaving them with virtually no access to justice, fearing reprisals and deportation if they complain of abuses,” said Rupert Knox, Mexico researcher at Amnesty International. “Persistent failure by the authorities to tackle abuses carried out against irregular migrants has made their journey through Mexico one of the most dangerous in the world.”
Amnesty international is talking about migrants from Guatemala, Nicaragua, etc. trying to make their way through Mexico to get to the United States. While Obama and Calderon are making trash talk they are apparently ignorant or just couldn’t care less about the conservatives, such a Walter Williams for instance, who want to first secure our border but then, and only then, to change our laws to make it easier for people from Mexico and Central America to come here legally. Many of these people have lived under oppression with no hope of a better life in their home country. They are the very stuff of immigration that has helped to make America great because having been denied freedom they have a keen appreciation for the liberty to pursue happiness in one’s own way. Americans will welcome them as they always have. First, politicians who see these immigrants not as unique human beings but only as part of the vote tally have to be defeated.
Psssst…Senor Calderon. Did you know that 71% of Arizonans support the new immigration law? And that Governor Jan Brewer has stepped out to a 13 point lead over her Democrat rival? Just thought you’d like to know.
I love Arizona. I’m committed to spending more time there. I’m getting on the motorcycle and heading for Monument Valley, Show Low, Payson, Prescott, Sedona, Jerome, Darnell Hill, Wickenburg, Tucson, and the Chiricahua Mountains. Oh, and the Carefree Highway. Soon.
Many white people voted for Obama not because they agreed with him but because they thought that electing a Black president would finally put to rest the accusation that America is a racist country. We have found that the race hustlers, both Black and White, are not ready to give up the race card. Most of them are a bit more subtle than this, though.
Maybe she means this as a parody? But wait, No. That would make her a racist.